Graham Platner and the New Democratic Machiavellianism

Sen. Susan Collins of Maine

Graham Platner‘s victory this week in Maine‘s U.S. Senate Democratic primary may be evidence that a new hyper-realism is taking hold in the Democratic Party. Faced with a crucial Senate general election against Republican incumbent Susan Collins, many Democratic voters appear willing to overlook Platner’s long list of personal controversies, instead focusing on the larger goal of winning a Senate seat in order to take back the Senate majority.

If this is the case, the shift is striking because Platner’s campaign has been shadowed by a series of damaging stories. including his tattoo that resembles the Nazi-era Totenkopf symbol, resurfaced online comments containing racist and sexist remarks, sexting other women after recently having gotten married, and accusations by former partners accusing Platner of abusive or intimidating conduct.

The political significance of Platner’s primary victory despite these controversies is not that Democratic voters believe all the allegations against him are false. Indeed, Platner’s Nazi tattoo and intolerant online postings were there for all to see, and he admitted to the sexting. Rather, many Democrats in Maine and elsewhere appear to have concluded that the stakes of the 2026 U.S. Senate battle outweigh them. Simply put, the Senate majority is up for grabs this November, and control of the Senate is all-important when it comes to approving or halting Donald Trump‘s legislative agenda, his judicial nominations (including potential U.S. Supreme Court nominations), and more.

The Graham Platner problem

Purple Senate battleground state of Maine

The campaign of Democrat Graham Platner, the oyster farmer and Marine veteran challenging Republican U.S. Senator Susan Collins in Maine, suffered more disturbing accusations over the past couple of weeks. One former Platner girlfriend alleged that during their 2013–2015 relationship, Platner engaged in physically aggressive behavior, including twisting her arm and preventing her from leaving the room during arguments. Another former girlfriend described Platner’s behavior in their relationship as “reckless,” while three women interviewed by The New York Times characterized him as physically intimidating or emotionally abusive.

Separately, reports published in the past month described sexually explicit messages Platner allegedly exchanged with multiple women while married. Platner acknowledged sending such messages, stating that he and his wife addressed the issue privately.

These are the latest in a series of troubling stories about Platner, which include a pattern of derogatory statements and/or actions that are offensive to multiple groups, as well as positions outside of the Democratic Party mainstream. For example:

Trump’s Kimmel complaint meets Trump’s violent rhetoric

U.S. Capitol insurrection, inspired by Trump

Donald Trump complains that comedian Jimmy Kimmel is a threat to America. After Kimmel joked on April 23 that Melania Trump had a “glow like an expectant widow”, and after Melania raised public objections, Trump characterized Kimmel’s joke as a “despicable call to violence” and demanded that Disney and ABC immediately fire Kimmel. The Federal Communications Commission , led by Trump’s hand-picked Chairman Brendan Carr, then ordered Disney’s ABC to seek early broadcast license renewal, even though those licenses were not due for years, with the threat that “[w]e want to review your license now and decide if you’re in the public interest.” U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren called this threat a case of the FCC pulling out “a sword to hang over every single news organization in America.”

Kimmel noted that his joke was obviously about the couple’s age difference — Donald is 79, Melania is 56. Even Republicans including Senators RafaelTed” Cruz and Rand Paul, and Rep. James Comer, spoke in support of Kimmel’s First Amendment rights. But Kimmel’s sharpest moment came when he flipped the script on Melania:

I agree that hateful and violent rhetoric is something we should reject. I do. And I think a great place to start would be to have a conversation with your husband about it.

That conversation would be lengthy. For instance:

Trump’s Iran War brings affordability to the fore

Gas prices causing election havoc

For Donald Trump and the Republicans, the political problem right now is sticky. It’s “affordability”, the new buzzword that takes the place of the less personal-sounding “inflation”.

The same issue that powered Trump’s 2024 campaign is now moving in the wrong direction—and voters are noticing. A new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds 77% of Americans blame Trump for rising gas prices, driven in large part by Trump’s Iran War and disruptions to global oil supply.

Gasoline prices well over $4 per gallon are only part of it. Energy shocks don’t stay contained—they ripple outward into food, transportation, and everyday goods. That broader anxiety is already showing up in more polling, where respondents say the economy is getting worse, and they blame Trump’s policies for these results. Moreover, all this is on top of inflation caused by Trump’s tariffs over the past year or more.

This affordability problem is cutting directly into Trump’s political standing. Multiple surveys now show his approval rating sinking into the 30s, with economic approval even weaker—just 31% approving of his handling of the economy and 27% on inflation. Moreover, this erosion in Trump’s standing is tied to a specific chain of events: a war of choice against Iran that has disrupted oil markets, pushed prices higher, and left Trump without a clear exit.

That connection is what harms Trump and the Republicans politically, because voters can tie Trump’s tariffs and his Iran War to their gas and grocery bills. When oil spikes above $100 a barrel amid instability in the Strait of Hormuz, they experience it as higher prices at home. And when that happens, accountability can be immediate and unforgiving.

There’s even a deeper problem here for Trump heading into the midterms. In 2024, he specifically ran against the alleged high prices of the Biden administration (ignoring that, first, the temporary high inflation was due to fixing the COVID mess that Trump left in his first term, and second, that Biden steadily brought inflation down, leaving office with a lower inflation rate than what Trump brings us today. Now, with rising gas and food costs and a war driving economic uncertainty, that argument is coming back to bite him.

This is the risk that lingers. Not just a war overseas, or even declining approval numbers—but a steady, daily reminder at the gas pump and the grocery checkout line that Donald Trump’s central promise of the last election isn’t being met.

Photo by A Siegel, used under Creative Commons license. https://is.gd/5gvmGq

Kash Patel drunk on power — and more?

Growing impression of U.S. Attorney General Kash Patel

The controversy surrounding FBI Director Kash Patel‘s alleged drinking problem is causing significant political damage. According to reporting from The Atlantic, current and former officials have described concerns about Patel’s alleged drinking and absences, including missed meetings and periods where he was unreachable in a national security role.

Those details are specific, visual, and easy to grasp. Recall that video and photos of Patel swigging beer in the locker room of the U.S. Olympic hockey team, on a vacation trip he took it Italy while Savannah Guthrie‘s mother remained missing and other important matters were pending. According to news reports, even Donald Trump disapproved of the awful optics in Patel’s public behavior.

And the Patel drinking story isn’t standing alone. In recent weeks, Trump has cycled through multiple high-profile officials. He fired U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi amid internal frustration tied to her handling of the Epstein files, while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was pushed out after news reports of her lavish cosplay videos and luxury jet. Most recently, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer was fired following allegations of sexual and other misconduct, becoming the third cabinet-level departure in a short span. Additionally, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has his own problematic past with alcohol abuse. And Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. faces new reports of yet more weird behavior with dead animals.

At best, these stories paint a picture of instability at the top of the Trump administration, and a pattern of personnel decisions that don’t hold up under scrutiny. At worst, Trump’s Cabinet is seen as a total clown car, indeed with the new nickname “Liquor Cabinet”.

That’s what gives the Patel story its staying power: it reinforces an emerging impression about how this administration operates — who gets put in positions of authority, and what happens after they’re there.

The issue regarding FBI Director Patel has now escalated even further. Lawmakers, including Democratic House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, have opened an inquiry into the drinking allegations. And now there are two new reports: first, “The Atlantic investigative journalist behind last week’s bombshell story about Patel has said she has since been ‘inundated’ with messages from new sources corroborating her reporting.” Second, as if to validate the journalist’s statement, a 2005 letter from Patel to the Florida Bar was revealed wherein he admitted to having been arrested twice for public intoxication and public urination. All of this ensures that the questions around Patel won’t fade anytime soon.

At that point, the damage isn’t just about one official. It’s about the pattern. And patterns are easy for voters to remember.

Photo by netwalkerz_net, used under Creative Commons license. https://is.gd/uwZJxr

Could U.S. Senator Mark Kelly be the next president?

U.S. Senator Mark Kelly

On Tuesday, U.S. Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona held an exclusive call with VoteVets, which was live-streamed on the VoteVets YouTube channel. Kelly had plenty to say about Donald Trump‘s conduct of his new Iran War, as well as affordability and other issues here at home. Kelly’s high-profile appearance raises the question of whether he wants to run for president, and if so, what his chances are.

Sen. Kelly has an impressive record of service to America. The son of two police officers and member of a military family, he served in the U.S. Navy for 25 years as a test pilot and aviator, earning numerous medals. During Operation Desert Storm (the 1990-91 Gulf War against Iraq), he flew 39 combat missions over Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Then Kelly became a NASA space shuttle pilot and commander aboard shuttles Endeavour and Discovery. In 2011, Kelly’s wife, U.S. Rep. Gabby Giffords, was shot in the head and critically wounded by a gunman who killed six people and wounded 12 others in an assassination attempt. During her recovery, she and Mark started Americans for Responsible Solutions (now the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence).

Is Epstein the big issue for the 2026 elections?

People have thoughts about Epstein

Right now, there seem to be two main issues that the news media and the public are talking about. The first one is the thuggish behavior of ICE agents attacking and imprisoning protesters, non-criminals, and even children. However, Donald Trump‘s administration is making it as difficult as possible for people to protest, film, or even write publicly about the illegal ICE activities.

The second issue the news media and many voters are talking about is the Epstein files. There, the Trump administration is having less success keeping the story under control. In recent testimony before Congress, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi tried her best to protect Trump and make the issue go away, at one point even saying that Americans should not be talking about the horrors of the Epstein files because “the Dow is over 50,000 right now.” However, every day, it seems additional prominent people become implicated in the Epstein story to one degree or another, from being friends or socializing with Jeffrey Epstein or riding on his plane, all the way to allegations of raping underage girls. In other countries, Epstein files revelations have taken down, demoted or sullied the reputation of high-placed officials and prominent figures, including:

In politics, are you a satisfier or a maximizer?

Kamala Harris, target of maximizers

In the psychology field, there is a concept known as being a “satisficer” versus being a “maximizer”. According to The Balanced WorkLife Company, a satisfier (we’re going to use this spelling because it’s much more common) is someone whose:

satisfaction is judged by meeting the standards they have in place. To them time and energy is considered a waste if there is a reasonable option ready for the taking. Satisfi[]ers don’t necessarily have low standards; they can be super picky or want the top brand.

In contrast, according to the company:

Maximizers are satisfied by researching as many options as they can. They sacrifice time and effort into learning as much about the “offer” as possible. They consider all the variations, advantages, and weaknesses. When the decision is final, they then compare it to the choices those around them made. The question on the maximizer’s mind is “Is there something better out there?

In simple terms, we like to think about satisfiers as choosing among the readily available options, and being happy with their best choice, even if they know it’s not perfect. Maximizers, on the other hand, are more like perfectionists, who obsess over every detail, and need everything to be just right. As one can imagine, such perfection is almost never achieved, and as a result, according to the book The Paradox of Choice, as cited by The Balanced WorkLife Company, “maximizers experience significantly less life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and self-esteem.”

Will Democrats vote for former Republican George Conway for U.S. House?

George Conway

Coinciding with the five-year anniversary of the January 6 Republican U.S. Capitol insurrection, former Republican George Conway has announced his candidacy as a Democrat for the U.S. House in New York’s 12th Congressional District. Conway’s candidacy is sure to attract plenty of controversy, given his former high-profile status as a conservative lawyer helping the Republican Party, and husband of Kellyanne Conway during her term as advisor, campaign manager, and White House Counselor to Donald Trump before and during his first term (the Conways divorced in 2023).

New York’s 12th District is quite unusual and high-profile. Covering a chunk of Manhattan, it is simultaneously the smallest, one of the wealthiest, and one of the most Democratic of all U.S. Congressional districts. Obviously, it is also home to a number of news media headquarters and bureaus. The race this year in the district will be to replace retiring Democrat Jerrold Nadler, who was an outspoken member of his party. On the Democratic side, the contest has already attracted Jack Schlossberg, who is the telegenic grandson of President John F. Kennedy and daughter of Caroline Kennedy, as well as a slew of other candidates. Thus, the Democratic primary (which almost assuredly will yield the general election winner) promises to be a lively one.

Thanksgiving 2025 political talking points are out, but will they help?

Will facts get through to them?

Just in time for Thanksgiving 2025, the ACLU and Everytown for Gun Safety have released their dinner table talking points, for those fair-minded folks (i.e. Democrats) to use against their bull-headed relatives (i.e. Republicans) when the conversation, like the food, heats up.

First up is ACLU, which states that its goal this Thanksgiving is “countering misinformation”. To that end, it has sent around a “Holiday Conversation Guide“. The guide talks about Donald Trump‘s threats to free speech, including to TV hosts such as Jimmy Kimmel, and to student protesters. It also mentions Trump’s deployment of federal enforcement agents and military troops around the country. Then the ACLU’s guide provides some tips, such as “Emphasize the facts and shared values”. For example:

Protests against the Trump administration’s abuses and policies have been overwhelmingly peaceful. The First Amendment protects the right to organize and protest peacefully, and law enforcement can’t break up a gathering simply because a few people have broken the law.